In September 2019, the Protocol amending the Double Taxation Agreement (DTA) between the Swiss Confederation and the United States (signed in 1996) entered into force and introduces the exchange of information on request including “group requests” in tax matters that make no distinction between tax evasion and tax fraud.
Both countries may now exchange, as of September 2019, information of fiscal interest that may be relevant for the application of the convention provisions themselves as well as their respective national tax laws, on all taxes, provided that taxation is not contrary to the convention itself.
This is in accordance with international standard for the exchange of information on request, which Switzerland already applies with about one hundred countries and territories (according to Art. 26 of the OECD Model). The reciprocity affirmed by the treaty is an important new step in tax relations between the two countries that has seen Switzerland succumb to countless unilateral US requests in the past.
The entry into force of the Protocol is retroactive to September 23, 2009: for facts dating back to that date at the latest, the United States may activate requests for individual information and for facts dating back to June 30, 2014 at the latest for group requests under the Fatca agreement. In 2014, Switzerland had already concluded the FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) agreement with the USA, which provides for the automatic one-way transmission of information exclusively from Switzerland (in accordance with Model 2 of the unilateral Fatca exchange). Now, thanks to the Protocol amending the DTA, the USA will be able to activate group requests for US clients of Swiss banks who have not consented to their bank transmitting their data to the USA or for clients qualified as “leavers”.
On the Swiss side, the Federal and Cantonal Tax Administrations can now submit requests for information for tax purposes to the U.S. administration for Swiss taxpayers with allegedly undeclared assets and financial income in the U.S. for facts dating back to September 23, 2009.
This can be done either for requests with identification of the Swiss taxpayer or in accordance with group requests whose essential criterion is not the identification of the taxpayer, but the pattern of behaviour used by Swiss taxpayers, clients of a financial institution based in the U.S.
For many years, the Swiss tax administration has been the subject of multiple (individual and “group”) tax relevant information request procedures on the US side and the renewed DTA, as ratified between the two states, now allows the Swiss authorities, for the first time, to obtain tax-relevant information in connection with financial assets deposited in the USA and allegedly concealed from the Swiss administration.
Switzerland and the United States signed a new FATCA agreement in Bern on 27 June 2024 focused to change the unilateral exchange FATCA 2 model to a bilateral model 1 system as Switzerland currently provides financial account data to the United States on a unilateral basis. In the future, it will also receive corresponding information from the United States within the framework of a model 1 automatic exchange of information. The change of model is expected to apply from 2027.
On the one hand, our federal and cantonal tax administrations will make good use of their authority to request the US to exchange information, either individually or in groups. On the other hand, an automatic and reciprocal exchange of information will not be long in coming. A Swiss taxpayer, whether individual or corporate, who has failed to fulfil his Swiss tax obligations with respect to financial assets held in the USA (and income therefrom) would be well advised to take action as soon as possible with a penalty-free self-disclosure procedure on the basis of the legal basis provided by Swiss law.
For further information on the above, please do not hesitate to contact us
The contents of this document are not intended as an expression of an opinion, but are for information and updating purposes only. Readers who wish to use this information should consult a professional in order to ensure compliance with legal and tax obligations under the laws of their country of residence. Steimle & Partners Consulting SA declines any responsibility for any direct, indirect, incidental and consequential damage to an action or omission related to the use, proper or improper use of the information contained in this document. We remain available for any further investigation of the above topics.